- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:48 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:48 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
That's pretty fricking straight forward, and yet I've gotten no end of people running around me in circles with their hair on fire.
Quit pretending like your only point in the thread is about the Fed's response with force.
You've made multiple comments on the legitimacy of the position of the BLM. It's not unreasonable for people to respond to your comments even if you believe it's secondary to your main point.
2
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:32 pm to moneyg
quote:Because you dont know what you are talking about in regards to Bundy and the history of the property and you refuse to look it up so yet again you bring nothing to the thread and you act like a tool
What's so fricking hard to understand? And why, based on that post, would you need to get me to look up Bundy's motivations? I mean, wtf? And you think I didn't contribute substance to the thread?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:42 pm to moneyg
quote:
Quit pretending like your only point in the thread is about the Fed's response with force.
You mean like when I said:
quote:
There could be something to his claim of watering/forage rights in perpetuity at the granting of the original claim. Bundy may not be breaking the law.
?
quote:
You've made multiple comments on the legitimacy of the position of the BLM
Wrong, I've commented on their response - always in the context of Bundy being wrong - which seems to be a premise in the OP with which I disagree that we can assume.
quote:
It's not unreasonable for people to respond to your comments
I object to the assumptions being made in the responses. If people would address the actual statements I'm making instead of attacking invalid assumptions on their part, I wouldn't have to post so much explicative text.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News