- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:04 am to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:04 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
You were WAY off. You are falsely assuming that I think Bundy is in the wrong.
I didn't assume anything in those regards... I just made the comment that you must have enjoyed the confrontation in Nevada since you would enjoy a confrontation between SWAT and your Tenants
quote:
public lands that he believes he has a servitude across to access water in perpetuity?
This... I don't care how cut and dry you think it is that the Feds are in the right, its not that simple. There is so much grey area, who was managing the land, who was accepting payments, what was supposed to be done, what wasn't done, etc...
3
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:08 am to Lsut81
quote:
ho was accepting payments, what was supposed to be done, what wasn't done
Exactly. If you are equating the Federal government with a private citizen. Then the following holds true.
Private citizen (Bundy) enters into agreement with another private citizen (government) to perform services at an agreed upon rate. Private citizen (Government) refuses to live up to the agreement by refusal of services and mismanagement of assets. Under a private contract, private citizen (government) has breached said contract and deemed the contract null and void.
End of story.
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 10:09 am
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:18 am to Lsut81
quote:
I just made the comment that you must have enjoyed the confrontation in Nevada
Why would I enjoy the government using armed force to evict someone who is in their rights?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:21 am to Lsut81
quote:
I don't care how cut and dry you think it is that the Feds are in the right, its not that simple.
Jesus.
fricking.
Christ.
I never said they were. I simply said that if they were, they were justified in using the force they did.
This thread started out with everyone assuming Bundy was in the wrong, but then claiming that the government was wrong to use the force they did. I disagree. If Bundy's in the wrong, then the feds were right to use the force they did.
The problem is that I believe Bundy may not be in the wrong. However the court has decided against him. Why aren't any of you bemoaning the court's decision? Isn't that where any injustice may be occurring?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News