Or it could be because we have one of, if not the best, pass catching TEs ever, along with two of the best pass catching HBs ever.

You are creating a false scenario to suit your argument.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Sophandros

Victoria Concordia Crescit

Member since Feb 2005

45218 posts

Posted on 4/6/14 at 5:29 pm to bonethug0108

quote:
You are creating a false scenario to suit your argument.

Of course he is.

Honestly, I don't know that a rookie WR not named Watkins or Evans is going to be a sure-fire fix at the position. In fact, no one knows.

I also think that it's bloody HILARIOUS that a couple seasons ago, many on this board (I think LE included) complained about the front office's decision to draft Meachem in the first round and the groupthink belief was that first round WRs were a waste. Now suddenly these guys want a first round WR, even at the expense of filling another need.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Lester Earl

Member since Nov 2003

279489 posts

Posted on 4/6/14 at 5:53 pm to bonethug0108

quote:
Or it could be because we have one of, if not the best, pass catching TEs ever, along with two of the best pass catching HBs ever.

You are creating a false scenario to suit your argument.

Ok, without talking out of both sides of your mouth, can you answer these 3 questions:

1)Did our RBs catch 145 balls combined because it was a necessity, or a luxury?

2)Did forcing the ball to Jimmy Graham cost us some turnovers, and possibly a few games?

3What kept our WR's from being as a effective as they were in years past? Was it because we had a great TE and the 2 "best" pass catching HB's ever?

2 ...

Report Post

Saints Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board