- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Its official U of Alabama is racist
Posted on 3/29/14 at 9:01 am to Sentrius
Posted on 3/29/14 at 9:01 am to Sentrius
I just want to see how he justifies his "outrage" when he supports Roe v. Wade, which the SC affirmed as a "right to privacy" issue.
If he agrees that killing babies (aka abortion) is going to be shielded from government interference by a “right of privacy”, then he should be having no problem with having no impediments to a right of racial association.
Doesn't mean he can't disagree with it on a personal view, but socially, I want to understand how he disassociates the "rights" of the two. He can't.
The “right of association” derives from the First Amendment, the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, the “rights reserved” clause of the 10th Amendment, and a simple, basic appeal to freedom.
If he agrees that killing babies (aka abortion) is going to be shielded from government interference by a “right of privacy”, then he should be having no problem with having no impediments to a right of racial association.
Doesn't mean he can't disagree with it on a personal view, but socially, I want to understand how he disassociates the "rights" of the two. He can't.
The “right of association” derives from the First Amendment, the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, the “rights reserved” clause of the 10th Amendment, and a simple, basic appeal to freedom.
1
Posted on 3/29/14 at 9:09 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
I just want to see how he justifies his "outrage" when he supports Roe v. Wade, which the SC affirmed as a "right to privacy" issue.
Because it feels right.
quote:
If he agrees that killing babies (aka abortion) is going to be shielded from government interference by a “right of privacy”, then he should be having no problem with having no impediments to a right of racial association.
But it's a woman's body.
quote:
Doesn't mean he can't disagree with it on a personal view, but socially, I want to understand how he disassociates the "rights" of the two. He can't.
Because it feels right.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News