Started By
Message

re: Saints Talk Draft Project: The Dirty Dozen for #27

Posted on 3/31/14 at 10:32 am to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279468 posts
Posted on 3/31/14 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Back on the size issue... another example might be Cooks vs. Benjamin. Every team has to have one ranked ahead of the other. It is the difference in value that is indeed the trump card. Like this- if they were both available you might have Cooks ranked slightly higher. But if a team goal was to get a big bodied guy you might select Benjamin over Cooks even though you rated him higher. Say that is the plan (big body) but Benjamin is gone. If Moncrief is your next rated big body type. His value is likely not close enough to select him over Cooks.

Value + Need + Scheme Fit



Right.

and size is the major determining factor in value, as well as scheme fit, and well as long term ceiling.

Cooks, for instance...his value isn't as high as his raw physical talent and output...because of his size.....And he may not fit every scheme, because his size may limit him from playing the outside...which also relates to his long term ceiling.


I still like him. But when you start talking about these things, size is a huge factor. That's part of why Mathieu lasted so long.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/31/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

That's part of why Mathieu lasted so long.
Yup, but he is exactly what I'm talking about when saying you shouldn't shy away from small guys just because they're small.

Like I said, ALL things equal you take the bigger guy. Never tried to argue that. Just saying rarely are all things equal.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram