Started By
Message

re: Why are we paying for kids up to the age of 26?

Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

It's not that their lazy, it's that boomers just fricked everything up for them. It's your fault they live at home and have no job opportunity.



Who raised them?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263293 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

It's not that their lazy, it's that boomers just fricked everything up for them. It's your fault they live at home and have no job opportunity.


Who raised them?



Who lets them live in the house until mid to late 20's? Definitely the parents fault.

Just can't see anyone wanting to live with parents over the age of 22 unless they are in school though.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24923 posts
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:35 pm to
My whole point is that we set up a system where the young and healthy are supposed to pay more so that the old and sick can pay less. Then we give the young what essentially amounts to a free pass until they are 26.

I know that the cost of family policies will go up, but those are already some of the most expensive policies out there, so you can't raise the cost too much. We need those 24 year olds paying 2 grand a year and going to the doctor zero times to make this work. Am I wrong about this?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram