- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anybody else think there is too much Pam on this season of Archer?
Posted on 3/16/14 at 3:22 pm to 03geauxtigers
Posted on 3/16/14 at 3:22 pm to 03geauxtigers
Three thoughts:
It's almost like they ran out of ideas for the spy agency.
The dialogue and jokes this season don't seem as "organic" as before, just forced and out of place.
The Cyril/Cheryl/Pam/Krieger combo should always be secondary to the main archer/Lana/Malary plot.
It's almost like they ran out of ideas for the spy agency.
The dialogue and jokes this season don't seem as "organic" as before, just forced and out of place.
The Cyril/Cheryl/Pam/Krieger combo should always be secondary to the main archer/Lana/Malary plot.
This post was edited on 3/16/14 at 3:30 pm
1
Posted on 3/17/14 at 9:15 am to Samso
quote:
The Cyril/Cheryl/Pam/Krieger combo should always be secondary to the main archer/Lana/Malary plot.
This. Never lose sight of the main focus of your series. People have their likes and dislikes among the minor cast, but nobody hates Archer.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News