Started By
Message

re: Forcing Breweries to Use a Distributor

Posted on 3/12/14 at 1:15 pm to
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101996 posts
Posted on 3/12/14 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

It's the good ole boy network.


Sort of. Most of the established wine/liquor distributors in the state, have their roots in prohibition bootlegging operations.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45972 posts
Posted on 3/12/14 at 1:35 pm to
No reason except costs. If a brewery wants to hire sales and staff all those trucks and pay the fees associated with shelf space, then they should be able to go for it. A distributor, though, already has the investment in those costs and pays the sales staff to negotiate shelf space and the drivers to deliver and in some cases, deliver and refresh the shelves. There is an enormous cost associated with going it alone, but by all means, go for it. I don't support helmet laws either. People should be allowed to slam their heads into a brick wall or concrete pavement if they choose to.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram