re: Missouri Bill Would Warn Parents of Evolution Boogeyman

quote:

---

Ring Species....there is no reason to believe that the differences between so called "ring species" are the result of any new, more complex, functional genetic information not already present in an ancestral, interbreeding population. Because there is no evidence of any such information adding change, it is misleading to say this gives evidence of evolution.

---

complete and utter drivel, when two populations within a parent population can no longer interbreed that is a new species

and yes new genetic information is being exhibited since mutations have changed morphological, colors, size differences, habitat fitment. These new mutations prevent them from interbreeding. They are no longer genetically viable becaust the daughter species has expressed new and different genetic code.


...obviously you dont understand the definition of species and hence speciation...and there are hundreds of experiments of plant speciations done by those pesky scientist on talkorigins.com

again the thing is you dont understand the definition of species


even if you do believe, stupidly, like you believe that no new information is created then you have to accept descent with modification even still...because embryos in birds specifically develop teeth and tails, suppressed hox genes within the genetic code of ALL ANIMALS INCLUDING HUMANS from our dinosaur and reptilian ancestors. We humans additionally develop pharyngeal gill slits during development from our fish lineage and then we do this marvelous thing were we grow full body coats of hair in the womb and slough it off from our ape heritage. Perfect examples of suppressed gene activity from descent with modification.