- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jimmy Graham might smash Franchise Tag rules
Posted on 2/18/14 at 10:02 am to Jcorye1
Posted on 2/18/14 at 10:02 am to Jcorye1
quote:
He lines up as a WR more than 50% of the time is an entirely rational argument
And that's all you got? So let's classify him as a TE in every discussion regarding pro bowl, all pro, and records, but for money let's say he is a WR because he lines up as a WR in the formation more than 50% of the time.
3
Posted on 2/18/14 at 10:08 am to PurpleAndGold86
Trade him and let breeds make another no name TE into a super star. Coming out of college graham was an unknown with potential.
Wonder how it would have turned out if the jets, bills, raiders, etc..... had drafted him.
Wonder how it would have turned out if the jets, bills, raiders, etc..... had drafted him.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 10:17 am to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
And that's all you got?
...that's all that matters right now per the wording of the CBA as it pertains to the franchise tag.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 11:13 am to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
but for money let's say he is a WR because he lines up as a WR in the formation more than 50% of the time
Dont get mad at the people saying this.
Get mad at the CBA that the players and owners agreed to that explicitly states that this is the case
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News