- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: which OBer open carrying in walmart scaried a customer
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:40 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:40 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I am against unreasonable open carrying because I fear it could lead to restrictions on carrying
who the hell gets to decide whats unreasonable?? you?
eta:Whiskey Richard
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbow.gif)
This post was edited on 2/17/14 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:41 pm to jorconalx
quote:
who the hell gets to decide whats unreasonable?? you?
common sense? tact?
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:50 pm to jorconalx
quote:
who the hell gets to decide whats unreasonable?? you?
The public. The guy who wins the argument isn't the one who screams and stomps his feet. It's the guy that can change the rules.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 2:01 pm to jorconalx
quote:
who the hell gets to decide whats unreasonable?? you?
If we don't, the law will.
quote:LINK
Reasonability is a legal term. The scale of reasonability represents a quintessential element of modern judicial systems and particularly important in the context of international disputes and conflicts of laws issues. The concept is founded on the notion that all parties should be held to a reasonable standard of conduct and has become embedded in a number of international conventions such as the UNIDROIT principles and the CISG.[1]
The earliest recorded use of the term reasonability goes back to Roman times. The Romans became known for their methods in assessing an individual's conduct according to the scale. It became common practice to attribute a "reasonability" score between 1 and 5, where 5 would indicate that a party had acted reasonably and would be entitled to the full sympathy of the court.
So my point is that if we don't want the court to decide what is reasonable, we better have a pretty good idea ourselves. We want to be at Reasonability Factor 5. fricktard wandering around ladies apparel in Macy's with poor muzzle discipline may be at a 4. Let's not risk it.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)