- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anti-First Amendment Rights LGBT activist decry Kansas new law
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:33 am to los angeles tiger
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:33 am to los angeles tiger
i wonder if those businesses will serve couple who have sex outside marriage?
6
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:37 am to SammyTiger
quote:
i wonder if those businesses will serve couple who have sex outside marriage?
Stupid question is stupid.
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:38 am to SammyTiger
You do realize that a wedding is an event and suing someone for not wanting to participate in your event because of their religious reasons is a right. It is not, a right of yours to then ask them such questions as you posted, is it? If what people do in the bedroom is supposed to be private, then don't tell people you are getting married to someone of the same sex. It's no longer private and others have the right to not cater to your event because of the first amendment.
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:54 am to SammyTiger
quote:
i wonder if those businesses will serve couple who have sex outside marriage?
I'm ok with businesses refusing service to certain people as long as they don't start chopping off hands or heads.
I hope I live long enough to see an LGBT group sue a Muslim business for not making a wedding cake.
Posted on 2/14/14 at 12:08 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
i wonder if those businesses will serve couple who have sex outside marriage?
Posted on 2/14/14 at 12:37 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
i wonder if those businesses will serve couple who have sex outside marriage?
What does hypocrisy have to do with the violation of rights
Posted on 2/14/14 at 1:11 pm to SammyTiger
quote:If a business for some reason had a policy of not serving people who cohabitate, then I would support their right to do so even though I would consider it pretty silly.
i wonder if those businesses will serve couple who have sex outside marriage?
A business owner is a private entity. Sadly, leftists hate freedom.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News