- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Loomis: Graham WILL be franchised if no long-term deal is met
Posted on 1/22/14 at 10:32 am to htran90
Posted on 1/22/14 at 10:32 am to htran90
Chad504boy's contract prediction of where tings should settle for Jimmy.
6 years 57.5 million 22 million guaranteed
Jimmy will attempt to look for upwards amounts of 11-12 mill a year but mickey hard balls his arse and gets him back down to earth at somewhere a bit over 9 mill a year.
6 years 57.5 million 22 million guaranteed
Jimmy will attempt to look for upwards amounts of 11-12 mill a year but mickey hard balls his arse and gets him back down to earth at somewhere a bit over 9 mill a year.
2
Posted on 1/22/14 at 10:35 am to Chad504boy
I can see that. I could also see us doing a 6 year - 60million with something like 29 mil guarantee
vjax got 5yr - 55.5m with 26mil guarantee
vjax got 5yr - 55.5m with 26mil guarantee
Posted on 1/22/14 at 1:14 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
6 years 57.5 million 22 million guaranteed
I agree with this completely. My point has been he will get better than Gronkowski, who signed a 6yr $53mill w/ $16 guaranteed. These numbers you post will be where Jimmay falls: same years, higher total and higher guaranteed, all withing fair distance of Gronki's.
Here are the two points of the contract:
1. Franchise will be between TE or WR, and I believe he will win the argument that he is to be franchised as a WR. I also think he should, because this is how they mainly used him. This does not mean I believe he should be paid as a Top5 WR, and that's where signing to a long term contract comes in...
2. Long term deal should not pay him as a Top5 WR. He isn't. He's the #1 TE who plays like a top 10 WR. He should be paid accordingly, and those numbers are fair.
This post was edited on 1/22/14 at 1:17 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News