Started By
Message

re: NFL "Late Round" Rookie Salary Differences: 2008 to 2013

Posted on 1/4/14 at 9:51 am to
Posted by Sal Minella
Member since Nov 2006
1951 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 9:51 am to
quote:

what has changed for late round picks?


The term "late round picks" has changed with the new CBA. A franchise is paying virtually the same money for a 2nd round pick as they are a "late round pick"

All rookies get a 4 year deal. 1st rounders are eligible for a 5th year option to be picked up by the team.

No rookie can't renegotiate the contract until after their third year. So if a 2nd rounder and 6th rounder are going to make marginally different money, go ahead and start the clock to get to the second contract.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432387 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 9:58 am to
quote:

The term "late round picks" has changed with the new CBA. A franchise is paying virtually the same money for a 2nd round pick as they are a "late round pick"

All rookies get a 4 year deal. 1st rounders are eligible for a 5th year option to be picked up by the team.

No rookie can't renegotiate the contract until after their third year. So if a 2nd rounder and 6th rounder are going to make marginally different money, go ahead and start the clock to get to the second contract.

again, how does this affect "late round" players like turner, faulk, etc?
Posted by SettleDown
Everywhere
Member since Nov 2013
1333 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 10:01 am to
quote:


No rookie can't renegotiate the contract until after their third year. So if a 2nd rounder and 6th rounder are going to make marginally different money, go ahead and start the clock to get to the second contract.
This to me is the big driving factor. Not that late round picks don't make much but that under the old CBA, the value of being in the early rounds was so great it was worth the risk. The new CBA significantly deflated what the early round picks are getting.
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10351 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 10:30 am to
quote:

The term "late round picks" has changed with the new CBA. A franchise is paying virtually the same money for a 2nd round pick as they are a "late round pick"


This is the key here.

So the sell now is:

Go prove yourself in the league and we'll get you a fat contract next time around. You have nothing left to prove there (school).

As opposed to before:

Give it one more year at school, and we can triple your first contract. (By moving up a couple rounds)

That's my take on it anyway. It sucks for CFB, but does take a lot of liability off the NFL. Monetarily anyway. Think of all those massive contracts that turned out to be busts. Hate to use a tiger as an example, but can't help but think Jamarcus...
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20561 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

So if a 2nd rounder and 6th rounder are going to make marginally different money, go ahead and start the clock to get to the second contract.


I would hardly call $500k a year, guaranteed, a marginal difference. You could argue that it is for the franchise, but not an individual.

LINK

Just divide signing bonus over the life of the contract. All first year salaries are based on signing bonus + rookie minimum 405k.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram