Started By
Message
locked post

"Brees got all the $, so none left for offensive lineman".... True or False?

Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:28 am
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43369 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:28 am
Go...


Also, why did we not franchise tag Bushrod? (A lot of people say its because we used it on Brees, but Brees signed his big deal in July 2012 and Bushrod didnt sign with Bears until March 2013 so how is that possible). TIA



Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
167137 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:30 am to
False, there were many other players under contract that weren't worth the shite they were paid way more so than Drew's contract.

Smith
Roman
Grubbs
Vilma
Bunkley
Jahri didn't have a great year
Hawthorne prolly isn't worth his deal
Moore
prolly some more out there.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111305 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:33 am to
quote:

"Brees got all the $, so none left for offensive lineman".... True or False?
False.

Brees is getting paid market value. As Chad posted, plenty of guys are making wayyyyy more than similar players at their position.
Posted by STJ206
NOLA
Member since Sep 2013
131 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:41 am to
IMO, Bushrod wasn't worth the money we'd have to pay him with the tag. Was he better than Charles Brown or Armstead? Absolutely. But not worth what the tag would've cost.
This post was edited on 12/23/13 at 10:44 am
Posted by Tigersaint09
St Petersburg
Member since Dec 2013
1125 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:43 am to
Smith, Harper, and Vilma are all going to get cut after the season, so that should help
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10050 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 10:48 am to
Partially true/false. We still have the cap room to sign good players and pay our rookies. Problem is it basically leaves no margin for error. If you miss on other contracts, you are screwed. You also have to draft really well. Our D is good because we have drafted well and signed solid FA's. We have done poorly on the O side and it is catching up. Once Graham gets on his new contract, we will even be in a more can't miss situation.

Having a great QB comes with a cost. As well as Loomis has done, he will have to do even better we have any chance of winning another SB.
Posted by charlieg14
Member since Mar 2006
3076 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 11:06 am to
No doubt in my mind that Brees wil part with $$ to sign Grahem or an OL. It never happens the same year they sign the contract. Brees' future success is diectly dependent on OL pass and rush UPGRADE along with younger WR's that can spread the field (along with Graham).
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 11:36 am to
True

1. His holdout cost us Nicks, though Loomis is in large to blame

2. His contract made it so we couldn't overpay a little for OUR STARTING LT...bushrod. We see the difference. Unlike Will Smith, Roman Harper and a number of other horrible contracts Loomis has made, Bushrod was a guy worth overpaying for, or at least keep Nicks

3. Unless Drew lowers his cap figure for the few remaining years he has left, this team isn't a contender

This is all before we get to Sean Payton's horseshite playcalling. If he has a stud line, a very good set of receivers and a great quarterback...he's a genius...take one of those elements away and he's the guy that Jim Fassel stripped of his playcalling duties. Great coach, but entirely overrated...can't believe he makes more than Bill Belichick.
Posted by supersaints9
Colleyville,Tx
Member since Dec 2009
14242 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 12:19 pm to
False. Bree's is making what he should be. It's a bunch of the other bums that aren't even good enough to be on the practice squad that ate up all the $$$
Posted by Thracken13
Aft Cargo Hold of Serenity
Member since Feb 2010
16215 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 12:29 pm to
for your question False.


in regards to your posting sucking like a Hoover Vacuum here and on the SEC Rant - True.
Posted by LC412000
Any location where a plane flies
Member since Mar 2004
16673 posts
Posted on 12/23/13 at 1:59 pm to
I would say True and False. True in that he ate up money we could have given offensive linemen. False in that if we cut his take, Moore should receive Saintsation pay
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram