- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How bad of a gamble would Kliff Kingsbury be for UT?
Posted on 12/17/13 at 11:26 am to Chad504boy
Posted on 12/17/13 at 11:26 am to Chad504boy
Not happening. Texas actually did this before when they hired David McWilliams (aka Mack I) to replace Fred Akers. McWilliams coached Tech for 1 year and performed above expectations so Texas hired him. He was in way over his head and lasted just a few years before they hired Mackovic (Mack II).
I do think Kliff would take the job because Texas could double his salary and though he is a Tech guy he also knows he is limited there. He's also from New Braunfels which is just South of Austin and in truth Kliff is not what you would call a Lubbock kind of guy
I do think Kliff would take the job because Texas could double his salary and though he is a Tech guy he also knows he is limited there. He's also from New Braunfels which is just South of Austin and in truth Kliff is not what you would call a Lubbock kind of guy
Posted on 12/17/13 at 11:49 am to aggressor
quote:
Texas actually did this before when they hired David McWilliams
McWilliams isn't really comparable. He was the captain on one of their MNC in the 60s and was an assistant and bag man under both Royal and then Akers for like 20 years, the last 5 or so of which he was their DC. He left for 1 year and then they fired Akers. It wasn't like he was unconnected and had 1 year HC experience.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News