Started By
Message

re: College Football Playoff using top 4 Conference winners: BCS era

Posted on 12/17/13 at 12:50 am to
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59164 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 12:50 am to
quote:

that's the opposite of clear. That's saying you could do one thing with one rationale or you could do something else with an entirely different rationale.


I would argue its being flexible and leaving some leeway without painting them in a corner with some fixed criteria. Personally I'm fine with and even prefer just taking the top 4 conference winners. As I detailed on page 1 only 2 years, 2003 and 2011 is there any real controversy. However, I'm also ok with the idea of the committee pending what they actually do. I don't think it will be radically different however, than just taking the top 4 or top 4 conference winners. Only SEC-o-files and Bama fans would be upset if Baylor was picked over Bama this year and only Big 12 fans and Baylor would really gripe if it was Bama over BU. While not everyone would be happy, hardly anyone would be unhappy if you get my drift.
This post was edited on 12/17/13 at 12:54 am
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36155 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 12:57 am to
quote:

that's the opposite of clear. That's saying you could do one thing with one rationale or you could do something else with an entirely different rationale.


I would argue its being flexible and leaving some leeway without painting them in a corner with some fixed criteria



my head is going to explode

Flexibility is for gymnasts. Standards and objective criteria are for things that matter.

You are in favor of moving the goalposts depending on subjective criteria from year to year? What a giant crock of camel dung.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram