- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 11/11/13 at 3:43 pm to Rockerbraves
Geauxxxx Noles!!!!
Posted on 11/11/13 at 3:44 pm to CP3LSU25
quote:
TigerJunior CP3LSU25
Posted on 11/11/13 at 3:45 pm to ballscaster
Bama qualified based on an "eyeball test" that was never applied to any team prior or since in the BCS.
Based on an eyeball test, Ohio state plays Michigan again in 2006, and Uga or USC replaces LSU in 2007.
Based on an eyeball test, Ohio state plays Michigan again in 2006, and Uga or USC replaces LSU in 2007.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 3:45 pm to ballscaster
Dude quit sucking Alabama's dick.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 3:48 pm to ballscaster
quote:
They qualified fairly for the national title.
They didn't even win their division of the SEC, that should've ended their argument right there. Okie State won their conference.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 3:48 pm to ballscaster
quote:Gotta agree it's fun to know how much the non SEC fans hate the SEC chant as was demonstrated in this video
I like when the rest of the country has to suffer an SEC national title
LINK
Posted on 11/11/13 at 3:48 pm to Rockerbraves
no
Posted on 11/11/13 at 3:49 pm to Rockerbraves
NO
Posted on 11/11/13 at 3:50 pm to beauchristopher
I will pull for whatever team plays bama. F the SEC. I'll support the SEC when they at least attempt to make the schedules even.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 3:51 pm to Broham
Seriously. I guess we don't have to call it the mulligan, we can just refer to it as the "second game of the century between the same teams in the same season played bc LSU didn't win the first one convincingly enough and OK State is not a brand name".
Posted on 11/11/13 at 3:51 pm to biglego
Not a chance. Geaux Noles.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 4:00 pm to SHMILL
Buck Fama. Seminoles all the way
Posted on 11/11/13 at 4:01 pm to Rockerbraves
No. I've always been SEC loyal, but until the conference pulls its collective head out of Bama's arse, I'm done with the conference bullshite.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 4:02 pm to LSUEnvy
Not no, but hell no.
If Bama were playing the fighting Bin Ladens, I'd strongly consider a turban.
ETA: Of course I kid. Happy Veterans Day!
If Bama were playing the fighting Bin Ladens, I'd strongly consider a turban.
ETA: Of course I kid. Happy Veterans Day!
This post was edited on 11/11/13 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 11/11/13 at 4:03 pm to Rockerbraves
HELL..........F---..........NO!!!!!!!!!!
GO NOLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GO ANYBODY ELSE BUT BAMA!!!!!!!!!!
GO NOLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GO ANYBODY ELSE BUT BAMA!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 11/11/13 at 4:04 pm to biglego
quote:Obviously a lot of votes are based solely on that eyeball test, and I'm sure we agree that that is inherently lamentable. Alabama and Oklahoma State were ranked very closely together in the computers, with OSU having a slight edge. I know that none of the computers are allowed to use margin of victory, but if they were, the fact that Alabama scored more than four times the points that they allowed in 2011 and OSU scored less than twice their opponents' combined total, Alabama would have been a solid #2 in the computers. There is plenty of mathematical support for either an Alabama selection or an Oklahoma State selection regardless of eyeball tests, and neither selection would have been unfair or unjust.
Bama qualified based on an "eyeball test" that was never applied to any team prior or since in the BCS.
quote:Florida and Michigan were tied in the computers. Florida got more votes (ie eyeball test results).
Based on an eyeball test, Ohio state plays Michigan again in 2006, and Uga or USC replaces LSU in 2007.
In 2007 Virginia Tech was #1 in the computers, but Ohio State was a unanimous #1 and the voters voted LSU ahead of VT largely because of a 41-pt victory in September. What many don't realize is that USC or UGA had computer rankings so low that they would not have qualified for the national title game even if every single voter voted them #2.
This post was edited on 11/11/13 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 11/11/13 at 4:05 pm to LouisianaLonghorn
quote:Irrelevant.
They didn't even win their division of the SEC, that should've ended their argument right there. Okie State won their conference.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 4:05 pm to RonFNSwanson
quote:
I hope auburn beats them and they LOSE TO UTAH in the sugar bowl
FIFY
Posted on 11/11/13 at 4:05 pm to Rockerbraves
I never have, nor will I ever pull for bama
Page 6 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News