Started By
Message

re: ULM responds to UL debate

Posted on 11/4/13 at 3:28 pm to
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43807 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 3:28 pm to
but is ULM sponsored by tapout? it sucks to suck I guess.
Posted by BengalBen
Midwest
Member since May 2008
2233 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 3:30 pm to
USL pushed to be called UL back in he late 80's. USL pursued it long before ULM.

Posted by Clockwatcher68
Youngsville
Member since May 2006
6920 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Plenty to do in Monroe, but if you want a list of restaurants and bars them frick off, look it up yourself


They also have some mighty fine wimmins there.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

USL pushed to be called UL back in he late 80's. USL pursued it long before ULM.


So it's first come, first served??
Posted by BengalBen
Midwest
Member since May 2008
2233 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

So it's first come, first served??


Nope. Should've made myself clear, I was responding to the quote below from a ULL fan on the first page indicating ULM started all this stupid shite.

quote:

ULM was the first school to jump on the "Louisiana" branding for athletics with Louisiana Indians. It never caught on, so they abandoned that strategy and went with "ULM
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram