Started By
Message

re: Why did LSU play Furman?

Posted on 10/29/13 at 8:28 pm to
Posted by BengalBen
Midwest
Member since May 2008
2232 posts
Posted on 10/29/13 at 8:28 pm to
So pay ULM $750k or pay Furman $450k?
Posted by Marlin2114
Member since Dec 2009
125 posts
Posted on 10/29/13 at 8:38 pm to
Exactly. The whole keep the money in state is a load of crap.

Why does any La school play anyone outside the state? I mean if we want to bitch at LSU about some bullshite like this then apply it across the board .

LSU doesn't owe anything to any La based school. Nor do they owe LSU. Why should LSU pay 300k more to play ULM than another out of state school? To help out the Warhawks?

Keep the money in state really holds up well when thinking thru your intl trade and economics lessons.

If keeping the money in state makes sense, then why not in a city, in a neighbiorhood or your own home. For that matter keep all your cash to yourself. Get the point? Complete bullshite. Based on some illogical well sounding crap to benefit one group
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram