- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Zeiss Conquest 3x9x40 vs Leupold VX-II 3x9x50
Posted on 10/27/13 at 1:57 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
Posted on 10/27/13 at 1:57 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
Brothers got a VX1 and I have a Prostaff. Leupolds lowest class and Nikons mid level class.
Nikons monarchs are the same price as the VXII's and slightly cheaper than the Conquest.
Nikons monarchs are the same price as the VXII's and slightly cheaper than the Conquest.
2
Posted on 10/27/13 at 2:03 pm to Tigah32
It truly does sound like you have it all figured out. I am not saying that I have more time behind any of them than anyone else but I have been behind almost all of them, in the field. Not in a store, not in a camp, not during midday looking at a tree across the yard.
Get some true time with all of them and the brand names will mean less and less.
Get some true time with all of them and the brand names will mean less and less.
Posted on 10/27/13 at 7:51 pm to Tigah32
quote:
Brothers got a VX1 and I have a Prostaff. Leupolds lowest class and Nikons mid level class.
The rifleman is lower quality than the VXI when it comes to leupolds.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News