- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who would you rather have Anthony Davis or Chris Paul in the long run?
Posted on 8/2/13 at 10:11 am to c on z
Posted on 8/2/13 at 10:11 am to c on z
Lamar Odom was a very good player back then. Arguably better than West, All-Star appearances or not.
If you want to judge a player's quality by an arbitrary award, I can't stop you. Though I do think McGrady and Yao are still receiving All-Star votes
If you want to judge a player's quality by an arbitrary award, I can't stop you. Though I do think McGrady and Yao are still receiving All-Star votes
2
Posted on 8/2/13 at 10:19 am to corndeaux
Hell even luke walton was decent enough for the lakers at one point
Kobe's supporting cast back then wasnt great but its not as bad as some make it out to be.
Kobe's supporting cast back then wasnt great but its not as bad as some make it out to be.
Posted on 8/2/13 at 10:44 am to corndeaux
This is a hard question. IF the question was right now, then the obvious answer is Paul. Let's say instead of Jrue and EG we had David West and signed Paul Millsap this summer. We would be a championship contender IMO.
There is really no correct answer for "in the long run." If you gage the long run as this year and championship contenders then ya it's Paul.
If you gage it by potential to have a dynasty, and actually win a championship not just contend for one then its AD. The argument being that Big Men have shown a more consistent ability to delivery championships with less talent than PG's.
There is really no correct answer for "in the long run." If you gage the long run as this year and championship contenders then ya it's Paul.
If you gage it by potential to have a dynasty, and actually win a championship not just contend for one then its AD. The argument being that Big Men have shown a more consistent ability to delivery championships with less talent than PG's.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News