- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Advocate columnist Matthew Harris believes Hill is done at LSU
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:41 am to CourseyCorridor
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:41 am to CourseyCorridor
He plead to carnal knowledge correct?
I don't not believe even a violation of his probation can undo that plea and reinstate a tougher charge
That is what I took your post as and I think others did as well.
He can and possible did violate his probation but once he's plead to a charge I think that's it. If the judge revokes probation he would serve time for the carnal knowledge thing
An again that is civics from high school so I could be off since that was 30 years ago
I don't not believe even a violation of his probation can undo that plea and reinstate a tougher charge
That is what I took your post as and I think others did as well.
He can and possible did violate his probation but once he's plead to a charge I think that's it. If the judge revokes probation he would serve time for the carnal knowledge thing
An again that is civics from high school so I could be off since that was 30 years ago
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:49 am to danfraz
quote:
He can and possible did violate his probation but once he's plead to a charge I think that's it. If the judge revokes probation he would serve time for the carnal knowledge thing
This is where discretion comes in. The judge doesn't have to revoke his probation, or she might. In deciding whether or not to revoke it, may she consider all the facts that surrounded his original plea deal -- the whole case -- or just the plea deal itself?
Obviously, I'm not proposing double jeopardy. I'm just saying there is discretion in how the court can handle this within the context of the plea deal. If he goes to jail, it would be carnal knowledge, not for sexual assault or, for that matter, punching a guy at a bar.
This post was edited on 7/9/13 at 11:53 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News