Started By
Message

re: Advocate columnist Matthew Harris believes Hill is done at LSU

Posted on 7/9/13 at 10:29 am to
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 7/9/13 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Poor LSU football


Are you fricking kidding me?


Yeah poor LSU football. Where was the outcry when that family got beat down at the gas station? Why didn't we get a fricking comment from Hillar's office on that one?
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 7/9/13 at 10:34 am to
Where's all the outrage over the dude who was murdered in the parking lot with his kid watching?

I'm not givin Hill a pass but the scrutiny put on this program comes across as a bit much. Racial slurs and fights happen pretty often in BR and other places and its never news
Posted by Jaydeaux
Covington
Member since May 2005
18816 posts
Posted on 7/9/13 at 10:39 am to
Douches like this guy are just upset at stuff like game day traffic keeping him from k mart. You can't step back, take a good look, and feel like J Hill is getting anything but heightened treatment. ADA grandstanding is shameful. Don't re elect the DA
This post was edited on 7/9/13 at 10:47 am
Posted by CourseyCorridor
Baton Rouge, La.
Member since May 2012
1996 posts
Posted on 7/9/13 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Why didn't we get a fricking comment from Hillar's office on that one?


This is what one might call "selective memory." Google's your friend if you use it, within a minute you'll find Hillar's comments to the Advocate about the Chevron attack.

This is a risk LSU knowingly accepted when it allowed Hill to sign a NLI after he was put on probation. This sort of outcome was always possible.

Again, people, this is probably nothing if Hill was not on probation. It would be just another bar fight among LSU students and it would be a note for the football beat writers and perhaps we would speculate on whether Miles would start Blue against TCU because of the bar fight.

But this is not about the bar fight. It's about the sexual assault charge, the plea deal to a misdemeanor, a sentence of probation and a violation of said probation.

The question now is, does the court look at this as simply a violation of terms of probation in a misdemeanor case, or does it look at it as violation of terms of probation in a case that was originally a serious felony sex crime charge, plead down to a misdemeanor?

This post was edited on 7/9/13 at 10:53 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram