Started By
Message

re: Okay, so now I'm serious about building a PC...

Posted on 7/4/13 at 11:39 pm to
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68670 posts
Posted on 7/4/13 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

You would be better off cutting back on that mobo and ram and getting the 8350.



8320 is barely any slower and overclocks well

Why not a 990FX board? If he wants to add another GC in the future it's the only way to go. No way I would sacrifice going down to a 970 board. That's just basically one of the cheapest and very good 1866 sets. I'd MUCH rather the better ram and mobo over a slightly faster CPU that is exactly the same in every other way. Plus he said he's running CAD, why cheapen the mem?
This post was edited on 7/4/13 at 11:43 pm
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167874 posts
Posted on 7/4/13 at 11:59 pm to
Unless he is using an APU, you will not notice the difference in 1600 vs 1866 ram outside of maybe scores on passmark. You can also OC that 1600 to 1866 if you truly wanted to.

That mobo I linked has all he needs and is Crossfire ready if he wants to do so in the future. If he goes Nvidia and wants to SLI than a different board would be needed. He can spend more on one if he wishes but that board I linked is a step above basic that fills all current and future needs without breaking the bank. What features does that Gigabyte have that makes it worth $50 more?

LINK

As far as that 8320 vs the 8350 scroll down to 3D modeling and tell me that isn't a big difference. That's something to consider since he said he is also going to be using it for Cad.

LINK

That's not to mention the 8350 will reach 4.4 on air fairly easy.

I would much rather put the $50 off that board into a more powerful CPU. The features between it and the one I linked are not anything that's going to increase his overall performance like a CPU will.

A few USB and audio plug ins on a board and 1866 vs 1600 ram is not going to bottleneck a system as bad as a CPU can.

ETA: He would possibly be better served with more memory over faster memory for Cad.

ETA 2: Yep

quote:

How Much RAM Should You Buy for a CAD Workstation?

Performance versus Budget

To achieve solid performance within a reasonable budget, that sweet spot today is likely between 6 GB and 16 GB of DDR3 1333-MHz RAM. DDR3 is third generation, dual-data rate memory technology, with Intel’s current platforms centered on 1333-MHz clock frequency — and it’s really your best memory option these days.


Ram speed in Cad doesn't matter as much as size.
This post was edited on 7/5/13 at 12:18 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram