Started By
Message

re: After Today's Fiasco is Federer NOW GREATER than Nadal?

Posted on 6/24/13 at 4:35 pm to
Posted by GatorsGators
Member since Oct 2012
13454 posts
Posted on 6/24/13 at 4:35 pm to
Taking clay out of the equation is ridiculously stupid, anyways.

Is clay not one of the surfaces on which they play?
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 6/24/13 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

Taking clay out of the equation is ridiculously stupid, anyways.

Is clay not one of the surfaces on which they play?


It's not a matter of taking it out of the equation. It's even more stupid to cite the head to head as if it exists in a vacuum without looking at the determining factors. Anybody think the head to head would be a little different if Nadal was making finals at the USO every season from 04-08?, but Federer was flaming out early at the FO?
Posted by ChiSaint
Silicon Valley, CA
Member since Feb 2008
366 posts
Posted on 6/24/13 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Is clay not one of the surfaces on which they play?


So are indoor hard courts (where Fed is 4-0).

What the h-2-h shows me is that Nadal is a significantly better clay court player than Fed. Otherwise, it's close.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram