quote:
And Ingram hasn't even played a 3rd year yet so that is why the first 2 years were compared. If you look back and compare the first 2 years of their careers then I would take Ingram's first 2 (considering the draft picks) all day every day.

Ill take a prime Ricky Williams over a prime Ingram all day every day. Everyone saying he was a bust is forgetting he was a top 3 rb in the league at one point in his career. You can't call him a bust just because of what the moron who drafted him traded to get him.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by saintsfan22

baton rouge

Member since May 2006

71808 posts

Posted on 6/14/13 at 11:25 pm to Melvin

quote:
Ill take high school Ricky Williams over a prime Ingram all day every day.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Hoodoo Man

Sunshine Pumping most days.

Member since Oct 2011

31637 posts

Posted on 6/14/13 at 11:41 pm to Melvin

quote:
You can't call him a bust just because of what the moron who drafted him traded to get him.

Isn't that exactly what a bust is?

If he was drafted in the fourth, no one would ever call Williams a bust.

We have people on this board complaining that we used a second and first for Ingram.
Are they complaining about Loomis and Payton?
No.
They're complaining about Ingram.

So which is it?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by djrunner

Baton Rouge

Member since Jun 2010

5318 posts

Posted on 6/15/13 at 12:41 am to Melvin

That's why you are not a GM and you just fail on message boards. We drafted Duece, Ricky's replacement in the first using the 23 rd pick in Ricky's second year. Why would we do that? Because they made a decision to get rid of him. You are either too old to remember, or too young. We sucked for years after the trade to get Ricky because of what we gave up to get him. We were trading for depth with MI, nothing more. We got him at 28 with a 1st round swap and a second.
It's Ricky.

This post was edited on 6/15/13 at 7:39 am

3 ...

Report Post

Saints Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board