Started By
Message

re: Gordon back to Clippers a possibility? (not for CP3)

Posted on 5/14/13 at 11:40 am to
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96897 posts
Posted on 5/14/13 at 11:40 am to
quote:

quote:

Hence my reluctance to trade a bunch of assets to LA for Bledsoe in addition to giving him a new contract.




Obviously it depends on what those assets are. You aren't forced to give him a contract. If you're trading GV and Lopez for him it doesn't really matter because they are due new contracts too. Roll the dice on the guy with the upside IMO.


Rolling the dice on Bledsoe doesn't do us much good if we still have no starting SF and if some of the pieces we trade (Gordon, Lopez, etc.) create new holes to fill.


I just see the point as a position where it would be nice to improve but we don't have a glaring need.

That's opposed to the 3, where we need a starter, the 5, where we need a better starter, or the 2, where we likely have to flip a malcontent and replace him with someone who wants to be here.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72112 posts
Posted on 5/14/13 at 11:47 am to
I understand. Ive already said I want to with roll with Rivers and GV at the point.

There will be a lot of moving parts and we have the draft and free agency as well. This is just one of those scenarios that will likely set off a series of moves.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram