I never advocate for a warning shot. Even though the Vice President of the USA stated that you should fire two blasts, this could get you in tons of trouble. It is literally a felony to discharge a weapon in a residential area.

If the perp is far away from you and hauling arse, you have successfully ended the threat. There is no need to fire an errant shot at him as he runs away. Unless you can prove you were actually shooting at an intruder, you'll probably be facing a felony charge.

Now, if you are in your house, all bets are off. If he is in your castle, you do what you have to do to protect yourself and your family.

I have read way too many stories where warning shots have been detrimental to the good guys. I highly advise you don't do it.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Chad504boy

4 posts

Member since Feb 2005

167137 posts

Posted on 5/6/13 at 11:56 am to bapple

quote:
I never advocate for a warning shot. Even though the Vice President of the USA stated that you should fire two blasts, this could get you in tons of trouble. It is literally a felony to discharge a weapon in a residential area.

If the perp is far away from you and hauling arse, you have successfully ended the threat. There is no need to fire an errant shot at him as he runs away. Unless you can prove you were actually shooting at an intruder, you'll probably be facing a felony charge.

Now, if you are in your house, all bets are off. If he is in your castle, you do what you have to do to protect yourself and your family.

I have read way too many stories where warning shots have been detrimental to the good guys. I highly advise you don't do it.

My warning shot question would only be outside if he was running away type deal, not shootin at him but sending a message. I know its against the law to discharge in a residential area, not sure how the cops would look towards this.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by civiltiger07

Baton Rouge

Member since Dec 2011

14076 posts

Posted on 5/6/13 at 12:37 pm to bapple