Started By
Message

re: Why would anyone hate ManU more than Chelski?

Posted on 5/5/13 at 4:15 pm to
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
31326 posts
Posted on 5/5/13 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

no clue, since we actually use our youth system unlike chelsea and city


You had to jump off this high horse a looong time ago. There was a a little run in the 90s when this was true but Man U are pretty much as bad as everyone else now.

De Gea- nope
Jones- nope
Evra- nope
Rafael- nope
Ferdinand- nope
Valencia- nope
Nani- nope
Anderson- nope
Rooney- nope
RvP- nope
Mexican- nope
Carrick- nope
Kagawa- nope
Smalling- nope
Ash Young- nope

You are basically hanging your hat on Johnny Evans (who sucks), Welbeck (who may be your 4th striker), and two guys who were in the academy 30 years ago. Congrats.

Also, like it or not, any club without money today is basically QPR. Except QPR actually have money which makes their story even more pathetic.

People, those that do, probably like Chelsea more because we don't have nearly as many douches in the team and we haven't had a red nosed cry baby manager notorious for getting preferential treatment for the past 20 years. Outside of John Terry and Ashley Cole for Arsenal fans there is really no good reason to dislike anyone that plays for Chelsea.
This post was edited on 5/5/13 at 4:23 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
85500 posts
Posted on 5/5/13 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Also, like it or not, any club without money today is basically QPR



Yeah but generating it from your fans/the club's marketability is one thing. Having some jerkoff owner throw money into a bottomless pit of transfer wages is something else.


quote:

because we don't have nearly as many douches in the team


Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125863 posts
Posted on 5/5/13 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

You had to jump off this high horse a looong time ago. There was a a little run in the 90s when this was true but Man U are pretty much as bad as everyone else now.


lulzzzzz

Evans
Giggs
Welbeck
Scholes
Cleverley
Fletcher

all united youth players on this years team. Every team since SAF has taken over has had a huge chunk of players from the united youth system and also selling and loaning players.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 5/5/13 at 4:46 pm to
Yeah, it's just that most Chelsea fans are unbearable.

We all know why people hate Man U. All the recent success, Fergie Time, it's the most popular club in the world, etc.
This post was edited on 5/5/13 at 4:48 pm
Posted by PTBob
Member since Nov 2010
7075 posts
Posted on 5/5/13 at 5:19 pm to
Chelsea, £673 million — 12 trophies — 3 Premier League titles (2o05, 2006, 2010), 1 Champions League (2012), 4 FA Cups (2007, 2009, 2010, 2012), 2 League Cups (2005, 2007) and 2 Community Shields (2005, 2009).
Manchester City, £572 million — 3 trophies — 1 Premier League title (2012), 1 FA Cup (2011) and 1 Community Shield (2012).
Liverpool, £414 million — 6 trophies — 1 Champions League (2005), 1 UEFA Super Cup (2005), 1 FA Cup (2006), 2 League Cups (2003, 2012) and 1 Community Shield (2006).
Manchester United, £352 million — 16 trophies — 5 Premier League titles (2003, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011), 1 Champions League (2008), 1 FA Cup (2004), 3 League Cups (2006, 2009, 2010), 5 Community Shields (2003, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011) and 1 FIFA Club World Cup (2008).

since 2003. transfer argument is a stupid conversation to have with us man utd fans. we've spent less and won more. nothing to talk about really. now as far as youth academy. now is less than previous years, but still better than most.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram