I'm thinking next year (or maybe even the remainder of this year), we should leave off the "others receiving votes" section. I'll still monitor the votes of course, but this way we have a top 25 and it is done. We could also include a "5 teams to watch" or something of that nature for 26-30. I think that might help the legitimacy of the poll rather than looking at the bottom and seeing a 1 off vote. This would put more focus on the actual top 25 that the group average provides.

Thoughts from the voters?

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by Dro

Barrett's Barleycorn

Member since Feb 2010

12619 posts

Posted on 4/30/13 at 9:24 am to AstroTiger

quote:
I'm thinking next year (or maybe even the remainder of this year), we should leave off the "others receiving votes" section. I'll still monitor the votes of course, but this way we have a top 25 and it is done. We could also include a "5 teams to watch" or something of that nature for 26-30. I think that might help the legitimacy of the poll rather than looking at the bottom and seeing a 1 off vote. This would put more focus on the actual top 25 that the group average provides.

Im ok with this...

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by harry coleman beast

Left Field

Member since Aug 2008

52210 posts

Posted on 4/30/13 at 9:28 am to AstroTiger

quote:
I'm thinking next year (or maybe even the remainder of this year), we should leave off the "others receiving votes" section. I'll still monitor the votes of course, but this way we have a top 25 and it is done. We could also include a "5 teams to watch" or something of that nature for 26-30. I think that might help the legitimacy of the poll rather than looking at the bottom and seeing a 1 off vote. This would put more focus on the actual top 25 that the group average provides.

Whatever you wanna do. You and Dro do a great job. Just a warning though if LSU loses another series there will be like 5 people voting lol.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by liquid rabbit