Started By
Message

re: Anderson the enigma

Posted on 4/29/13 at 9:40 am to
Posted by ShamelessPel
Metairie
Member since Apr 2013
12725 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 9:40 am to
quote:

Amen. I was opposed to picking up Anderson from the beginning. We already had a good back-up PF in Landry and Ayon had good chemistry with Vasquez. So they traded away Ayon and let Landry walk. If you compare Anderson to Landry this year..

Anderson-
30.9 mpg, 16.2 ppg, 6.4 rpg, 1.2 apg, 18.2 PER

Landry-
23.2 mpg, 10.8 ppg, 6.0 rgp, .80 apg, 17.6 PER

Anderson makes 9m a year, Landry makes 4m. Did we really upgrade that much?


Comeon man. Landry had Curry/Jack/Thompson. Anderson had Vasquez/Rivers/Roberts/ 50% Gordon. At least find a player on a crappy team to compare him to, not one that's up 3-1 in the playoffs.

Anderson's % dipped because he was terrible late in the year. You could tell mentally that he was slumping and he needs to find a way to fight through those slumps. His form dipped dramatically too. He started pushing his shots, stopped following through, and was shooting flat footed. I'm hoping this isn't a trend with him.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9856 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 9:53 am to
quote:

At least find a player on a crappy team to compare him to, not one that's up 3-1 in the playoffs.


I'm comparing him to the guy he replaced. Why wouldn't I? Him having a good year helps my point.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram