- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Otto Porter or Trey Burke
Posted on 4/26/13 at 11:33 am to brmark70816
Posted on 4/26/13 at 11:33 am to brmark70816
quote:
Why would GSW trade for an injured/highly paid Gordon to replace a young, good Thompson?
Because the Warriors have too many shooters and not enough penetrators. On top of that they have serious money problems next season that will kill the depth that has made them a playoff team. The trade I proposed where we take both of their bad contracts let them keep things relatively intact.
The choice is keep the same roster but have to choose between keeping either Landry or Jack, or trade Thompson for Gordon and Barnes for Shabazz and keep both Landry and Jack. If they want to remain a playoff team and they aren't scared of Gordon's knee, that's a trade they strongly consider.
1
Posted on 4/26/13 at 11:50 am to TigerinATL
quote:
The choice is keep the same roster but have to choose between keeping either Landry or Jack, or trade Thompson for Gordon and Barnes for Shabazz and keep both Landry and Jack. If they want to remain a playoff team and they aren't scared of Gordon's knee, that's a trade they strongly consider.
I guess it depends how much of a salary dump the Warriors are attempting to do.
I'd take on Jefferson and Biedrins for a season if it meant getting Thompson and Barnes for Gordon and a 1st.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News