- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Eric Bledsoe's Trade Value
Posted on 4/24/13 at 4:29 pm to teke184
Posted on 4/24/13 at 4:29 pm to teke184
quote:
You have to get down to Bledsoe's defense vs. Vasquez' defense for Bledsoe to look significantly better and that depends on how much you think of the PER stat as a measure of defense.
I love Vasquez, but he's a liability on D. Bledsoe is a great defender by all accounts, and that shouldn't be under-valued.
This team's weakness was defense after all.
Bledsoe is better than Vasquez at everything but passing, and he's better at things that aren't necessarily in the box score--like beating his man and getting in the lane--opening up our offense to more than just Vasquez pick-and-roll majority of the time.
...I think Vasquez AND Bledsoe would be great on this team--not both as starters, but sharing minutes next season. Bledsoe could learn from Vasquez, and this team needs guard depth desperately. Then Vasquez takes his money elsewhere, and we have our PG.
I don't know how the team really feels about Lopez. He had a very good season on a good contract, but he was on a lottery team and couldn't get significant bench minutes on the Suns last season. Major pick-and-roll D and rebounding weakness, but very good offensively.
That, as well as center free agency plans and plans for Davis will have a big impact on what we are willing to give for Bledsoe, obviously.
Posted on 4/24/13 at 4:35 pm to drake20
My point was that, offensively, it's a wash.
You have to get down to defense to see a difference and, even then, I'm not sure that bringing in Bledsoe is a significant enough upgrade to justify what the Clip Show wants in trade.
I have no objections to making him a tender offer as an RFA next off-season, however.
You have to get down to defense to see a difference and, even then, I'm not sure that bringing in Bledsoe is a significant enough upgrade to justify what the Clip Show wants in trade.
I have no objections to making him a tender offer as an RFA next off-season, however.
Posted on 4/24/13 at 4:46 pm to drake20
2008 #26 George Hill, #34 Mario Chalmers (top 5 PG by his own estimation ) #45 Goran Dragic
2009 #17 Jrue Holiday, #18 Ty Lawson, #19 Jeff Teague, #21 Darren Collison
2010 #18 Eric Bledsoe, #19 Avery Bradley, #28 Greivis Vasquez
The 2011 and 2012 drafts were a little light on PGs, but 3 years in a row a mid - late 1st was enough to land one of the many guys we've all been ready to move a bunch of assets or cap space for. The Pelicans aren't in Win Now mode. A PG upgrade may be a need, but it's a need that can and should wait if the cost is too high.
2009 #17 Jrue Holiday, #18 Ty Lawson, #19 Jeff Teague, #21 Darren Collison
2010 #18 Eric Bledsoe, #19 Avery Bradley, #28 Greivis Vasquez
The 2011 and 2012 drafts were a little light on PGs, but 3 years in a row a mid - late 1st was enough to land one of the many guys we've all been ready to move a bunch of assets or cap space for. The Pelicans aren't in Win Now mode. A PG upgrade may be a need, but it's a need that can and should wait if the cost is too high.
Posted on 4/25/13 at 7:18 am to drake20
quote:
Bledsoe is better than Vasquez at everything but passing,
False
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News