- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 12:40 pm to ILikeLSUToo
Posted on 8/29/13 at 12:40 pm to ILikeLSUToo
quote:
I don't know why I care, but everything is at 7.9 except for my damn CPU, which is at 7.8. I'm not sure what it takes to get a 7.9, but I'm guess it probably has very little to do with actual performance. It's probably core count or something
i was actually wondering what it took to get a 7.9 cpu score. i7 3570 i suppose?
2
Posted on 8/29/13 at 12:49 pm to jcole4lsu
My score is still a 5.9 because I'm too cheap to buy a ssd. 
Posted on 8/29/13 at 2:24 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
i was actually wondering what it took to get a 7.9 cpu score. i7 3570 i suppose?
You mean i5-3570 or i7-3770? Either way, that ain't gonna do it because my 4770k at 4.7GHz is still getting 7.8.
I guess it does run some kind of synthetic benchmark, but it can't be worth a damn since the whole process takes only a couple of minutes to score every component. That's why I was curious how off-base it really is -- for example, if it were to give an 8320 or 8350 a 7.9 simply because it's sort of an 8-core processor.
I read somewhere that a guy running a dual-CPU setup with 6-core Xeons still got 7.8. Someone else claimed they got a 7.9 with a 6-core Intel at 5.6GHz. WTF, Windows.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News