- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anybody know anything about Actuaries?
Posted on 3/25/13 at 6:37 pm to Mootsman
Posted on 3/25/13 at 6:37 pm to Mootsman
I don't think we have any actuaries/actuarial analysts that frequent here so ill give it a go based on researching it myself several years ago.
If he has a semi-quantitative degree or background, there really isn't a need to go back to school for an MS. If he has a decent GPA he should be able to land an entry level gig as long as he is willing to relocate.
The exam process is hella rigorous. Think 5-10 years of CFA exams. He'll work 40-50 hours a week but will probably have to study an additional 20 hours a week consistently if he wants to progress. And progression is apparently important to some firms. It sounded common to include this into people's performance reviews.
From what I here, the work itself isn't too demanding, unless you're a consultant. If you work for an insurance company, the work seemed pretty straight forward. I've heard some call it boring. He'll be a spreadsheet jockey for the first few years but afterwards it seems the work gets more interesting (relatively speaking).
As I said earlier, he will have to be willing to relocate. The jobs are sparsely scattered all across the country but seem to concentrate in Chicago, NYC, ATL, and Conneticut (for reasons I don't understand).
Personally, I was all for it but I didn't want to sign my life away to take the exams. I was already in my MS program and had two small kids, so I was ready to be done with school. But I think I would have liked the work.
Just my two cents based on a little research. Good luck to your bud.
If he has a semi-quantitative degree or background, there really isn't a need to go back to school for an MS. If he has a decent GPA he should be able to land an entry level gig as long as he is willing to relocate.
The exam process is hella rigorous. Think 5-10 years of CFA exams. He'll work 40-50 hours a week but will probably have to study an additional 20 hours a week consistently if he wants to progress. And progression is apparently important to some firms. It sounded common to include this into people's performance reviews.
From what I here, the work itself isn't too demanding, unless you're a consultant. If you work for an insurance company, the work seemed pretty straight forward. I've heard some call it boring. He'll be a spreadsheet jockey for the first few years but afterwards it seems the work gets more interesting (relatively speaking).
As I said earlier, he will have to be willing to relocate. The jobs are sparsely scattered all across the country but seem to concentrate in Chicago, NYC, ATL, and Conneticut (for reasons I don't understand).
Personally, I was all for it but I didn't want to sign my life away to take the exams. I was already in my MS program and had two small kids, so I was ready to be done with school. But I think I would have liked the work.
Just my two cents based on a little research. Good luck to your bud.
Posted on 3/25/13 at 6:45 pm to ZereauxSum
quote:
Think 5-10 years of CFA exams
See that is insane. He went to UVA and got a degree in econ but only had a 2.3. He is smart but insanely lazy. That is why he's talking of going back for the MS.
5-10 years of exams hardly would make that worth it but I have heard it is lucrative.
Thanks for the insight.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News