- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wow, Emmert taking a beating as a stumbling, bumbling NCAA Pres
Posted on 2/19/13 at 1:49 pm to shel311
Posted on 2/19/13 at 1:49 pm to shel311
And as the school, you would try to discredit the info obtained. If it is just testimony, you can probably do a great job of discrediting it. But if the rat turns over hard evidence, then what?
Posted on 2/19/13 at 1:52 pm to Archie Bengal Bunker
quote:
And as the school, you would try to discredit the info obtained. If it is just testimony, you can probably do a great job of discrediting it. But if the rat turns over hard evidence, then what?
If the NCAA paid for it, they can't use it because it was obtained outside their rules for obtaining admissible evidence.
Posted on 2/19/13 at 2:08 pm to Archie Bengal Bunker
quote:
But if the rat turns over hard evidence, then what?
then there is no need for the NCAA to pay to get someone to ask questions in a hearing unrelated to the matter the of the hearing now is there.
Posted on 2/19/13 at 2:45 pm to Archie Bengal Bunker
quote:
And as the school, you would try to discredit the info obtained. If it is just testimony, you can probably do a great job of discrediting it.
Yes, IF the NCAA allows the school to also interview the person making claims against you. But the NCAA doesn't allow that if they don't want to. It basically goes like this....
Scumbag: "I gave illegal benefits to athletes at School X and the school knew."
NCAA: "Oh shite, School X, you're going down unless you can prove Scumbag is lying."
School X: "Okay. We need to interview this guy and hear what he told you so we can fight this."
NCAA: "No. He already told us a bunch of stuff and even though he's a criminal we believe him. You can't cross examine him."
School X: "Okay, well, how are we supposed to prove he's fabricating stuff if we can't interview him ourself?"
NCAA: BANHAMMER.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News