Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 2/19/13 at 8:36 am to
Posted by jacks40
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
11877 posts
Posted on 2/19/13 at 8:36 am to
quote:

And now he's changing a testing system the NFL has used for 40 years to make it "socio-economically equal" whatever the hell that means, and the NFL agrees


The NFL understands that having more data/ways to evaluate prospects is a good thing.

Good companies don't stick with something just because that's way it's been for 40 years.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86619 posts
Posted on 2/19/13 at 8:38 am to
Right, I understand the need to adapt and evolve, it just doesn't really seem like there was anything wrong with the other version. Or at least, wrong in the sense that it caters to white people, which is what I'm assuming this dude is getting at with the "socioeconomic" angle.

I mean, if they wanted to have a real legit testing system, why not just give them a thorough, detailed test related to plays/schemes/skills for their position? I agree with the poster above that said doing these math/logic problems doesn't really prove a whole hell of a lot. I guess my whole issue isn't with changing the test, it's changing it to be more "equal", which we still don't know wtf they mean.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram