Started By
Message

re: Watching old Siskel & Ebert Reviews

Posted on 2/17/13 at 6:35 pm to
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63877 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Ebert was a shitty critic from a writing standpoint, too.


What are you talking about? Ebert is a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
143057 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

quote:

Ebert was a shitty critic from a writing standpoint, too.

What are you talking about? Ebert is a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer

Ebert wasn't that great a reviewer -- I hesitate to cal him a critic -- but he was approximately 2,786 times better than Siskel
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36483 posts
Posted on 2/17/13 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

quote:
Ebert was a shitty critic from a writing standpoint, too.


What are you talking about? Ebert is a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer.


He imitated Pauline Kael, and badly

Not to say every review he ever wrote was bad, some were very good. Most felt like a cheapened Kael to me
This post was edited on 2/17/13 at 9:15 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram