- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should Copeland be playing a little lighter?
Posted on 2/10/13 at 8:21 am
Posted on 2/10/13 at 8:21 am
I don't think it would kill the guy to play 10 lbs lighter
He would still be plenty big enough and might have a little more speed/agility as a guy with the ball in his hands if we look his way in the passing game
He would still be plenty big enough and might have a little more speed/agility as a guy with the ball in his hands if we look his way in the passing game
18
Posted on 2/10/13 at 8:26 am to Powerman
He's a fullback. His job is to block and get one or two yards if necessary. Why would you want him to lose weight? Plus he absolutely demolishes people.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 8:27 am to Powerman
I think he could stand to drop a little weight if he's gonna be getting the ball.
Think Vadal could really stand to drop some if he's gonna remain at tackle.
Think Vadal could really stand to drop some if he's gonna remain at tackle.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 8:37 am to Powerman
quote:
He would still be plenty big enough and might have a little more speed/agility as a guy with the ball in his hands if we look his way in the passing game
I think he looked plenty agile during that reception against Alabama
Posted on 2/10/13 at 8:51 am to Powerman
Not lighter, but less PT. We are too predictable with a fb in the game. We need to immulate Bama's "O" IMO. They have a power running game, but without a fb. Put an extra TE in the game or another receiver and give your qb more options in the passing game. Nothing wrong with having Copeland in there on short yardage situations, but it shouldn't be a part of our base offense. JMO.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 8:51 am to Powerman
he's a wrecking ball with legs.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 8:58 am to Powerman
He will eat your children.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 9:09 am to Powerman
10lbs wouldn't make a difference.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 9:28 am to Powerman
Did you know JC's first name is Javoddron?
Just say that out loud once. It's awesome... sci-fi super villain.
Just say that out loud once. It's awesome... sci-fi super villain.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 9:38 am to Powerman
quote:
Powerman
none of your damn business
Posted on 2/10/13 at 10:17 am to Powerman
Little smarter would be preferable.
Posted on 2/10/13 at 10:17 am to Powerman
If it ain't broke...
Posted on 2/10/13 at 11:37 am to Powerman
it would be better if he didn't carry the ball...especially in really predictable situations
Posted on 2/10/13 at 11:51 am to Powerman
Actually the coaches do want him to get leaner. He would be even better around 255-260. Which is also around the weight that NFL teams will want him to weigh
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:12 am to Powerman
quote:
Should Copeland be playing a little lighter?
His main focus needs to be not getting so many damn 15 yd penalties!
Posted on 2/11/13 at 11:30 am to Powerman
If it stops him from getting personal fouls
Posted on 2/11/13 at 12:19 pm to Powerman
If you take away his penalties, where in the NC! The guy is a beast, but lighter and smarter would be better IMO!
Posted on 2/11/13 at 1:42 pm to Powerman
Yes. And a few inches taller, but it ant gonna happen. Next question please........
Posted on 2/11/13 at 2:08 pm to Powerman
Neaux, he is like a rolling ball of steel at his current measurables.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News