Started By
Message

re: This Article Makes Me Sick (Gun/Ammo Control)

Posted on 2/3/13 at 11:47 am to
Posted by El Josey Wales
Greater Geismar
Member since Nov 2007
22710 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 11:47 am to
I think the Supreme Court has already ruled that bullets were protected under the 2nd amendment too.

I could be wrong and I am too lazy to go look it up at this present juncture.

Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11914 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 11:50 am to
Some of the comments:

"The author of this article doesn't sound familiar with cartridge reloading at all..."

"It doesn't take nearly as much time as you clearly imagine--by the way, a bullet is part of a round of ammunition which also includes: a cartridge, a primer and powder as well as a bullet which is made of lead (sometimes with a copper coating). You really should learn more about something before you willy-nilly write about. As a journalist myself, I know that is simply doing the job."

And... Wait for it...

"Yeah, except no one's ever heard of you. Like how I'm a porn star."

Posted by MoreOrLes
Member since Nov 2008
19472 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 11:51 am to
Obviously limiting the second amendment would be the intent of any law that targeted ammo in any way IMO.

What gets me is the last sentence. The author of the article truly believes that he above anyone else knows what the founding Fathers meant. As if to say they made a mistake but he can clarify.

What an asshat. Its scary how many others probably agree with this clown
Posted by assaultweapon
Member since Jan 2013
13 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 11:52 am to
I remember reading that the supreme court ruled that ammunition was included in the 2nd ammendment.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram