Started By
Message

re: Shouldn't it be a helmet-to-helmet penalty first, negating the fumble

Posted on 1/20/13 at 8:25 pm to
Posted by Stevo
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
11413 posts
Posted on 1/20/13 at 8:25 pm to
Ok. If that was hit on WR, there would have been flag, IMO.
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
89941 posts
Posted on 1/20/13 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Ok. If that was hit on WR, there would have been flag, IMO.



Yes, if the WR was in the air or hadn't made a 'football move', but not once he's caught the ball and running.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram