Started By
Message

re: Congress will not pass weapons ban

Posted on 1/14/13 at 11:40 am to
Posted by Mung
NorCal
Member since Aug 2007
9054 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Sheep


Hmm, some might call people that get amped up en masse every couple of years for something that is never going to happen, send $ to the NRA and pay outrageous prices for useless weapons, sheep. It all depends on who is leading the flock as to who follows.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 11:44 am to
One group has a history of trying to take away rights. The other is portrayed as a group that is evil, for exercising a right. You wouldn't have people buying and lobbying, if there weren't a threat by people elected to Congress to infringe on their rights.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Hmm, some might call people that get amped up en masse every couple of years for something that is never going to happen, send $ to the NRA and pay outrageous prices for useless weapons, sheep.
Pretty stupid fricking definition of "sheep", but hey, whatever gets you off.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81969 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Hmm, some might call people that get amped up en masse every couple of years for something that is never going to happen,
Well yeah, except for the inconvenient fact that it has happened before. In The USA.
Posted by OldSouth
Folsom, LA
Member since Oct 2011
10943 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Hmm, some might call people that get amped up en masse every couple of years for something that is never going to happen, send $ to the NRA and pay outrageous prices for useless weapons, sheep. It all depends on who is leading the flock as to who follows.


LINK

quote:

The tentative agreement would further restrict New York's ban on assault weapons and limit the size of magazines to seven bullets, rather than the current 10. Other elements, pushed by Republicans, would refine a mental health law to make it easier to confine people determined to be a threat to themselves or others.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram