Started By
Message

re: Would Johnny F'in Fotball be a QB on LSU?

Posted on 1/4/13 at 11:31 pm to
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 1/4/13 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

Flynn was always the better QB. JaMarcus Brooks was a huge guy with great talent and a monster arm. Between his ears was the lost city of Atlantis. Besides that he was a flake and lazy. He isn't in the league for a reason.


None of that has anything to do with him being better than Flynn at LSU. Two different coaching staffs decided this btw.

quote:

Flynn was a very poised, cerebral ballplayer. He won big games. JaMarcus turned the ball over and made a lot of bad decisions. Fumbling the ball at the 1 against Florida, our lone loss of the season that cost us the NC in 2006. He did stupid shite like that all the time.


There were 2 losses in the 2006 season.

Flynn had more turnovers in 2007 than Russell did in 2006.

Russell won the manning award as the best quarterback in the nation in 2006 and was a semi finalist for the davey obrien. Flynn was not on the short list for either.

Russell was first team all sec. flynn was not even 2nd team.

Russell is superior to Flynn at lsu in any and every measurable statistic. Your argument is incorrect, baseless, and has no actual merit.
Posted by Da #1 Stunna
985
Member since Oct 2012
1090 posts
Posted on 1/4/13 at 11:37 pm to
I accept that you have a bunch of numbers and awards to back you up. Flynn and Mauck, both guys that didn't get a sniff of any of those numbers or awards, have rings. They have results.

JaMarcus Brooks is a living 30 for 30 story for all his personal accomplishments.

Statistics are for losers.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram