- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Just got back from seeing Django Unchained
Posted on 12/26/12 at 6:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/26/12 at 6:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
better acting
better dialogue
better story
more tense scenes (there is nothing in django that comes close to the opening scene or the bar scene of IB)
False
Even
Maybe
Fair point
Better acting in IB than Django?? Django is the type of movie that may get 3 nods for Best Supporting Actor.
Its Waltz/Fassbender(sp) and thats it in terms of "great acting" in IB. Dicaprio/Jackson destroys Brad Pitt and whoever else.
I thought the dialogue was just as good. The interactions of Shultz with the Marshall, the Speck brothers, etc were tremendous.
Basterds had a better story, but Django executed its story better. There was no scene as intense as the Tavern scene. But the "Handshake" scene was tremendous as well.
Again...watch it again...give it some more time...Let it sink in.
Inglorious Basterds was great....but I think ultimately Django will be viewed/favored more as time goes by.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 6:25 pm to Rittdog
I will be watching it again this weekend.
Did anyone else enjoy the 2nd half more than the first? I thought it was much better
Did anyone else enjoy the 2nd half more than the first? I thought it was much better
Posted on 12/26/12 at 6:28 pm to Rittdog
quote:
Django is the type of movie that may get 3 nods for Best Supporting Actor.
and waltz was a lot better in IB, plus there were great performances by the french scarlet jo and diane kruger
there wasn't anything like that in django, imho. jamie fox just was mean and black and shultz was unremarkable. leo was pretty good, though
quote:
Dicaprio/Jackson destroys Brad Pitt and whoever else.
jackson was a one-trick pony who got old after the initial scene (which was hilarious)
quote:
The interactions of Shultz with the Marshall, the Speck brothers, etc were tremendous.
they were forced and repetitive, like samuel j jackson's character
quote:
But the "Handshake" scene was tremendous as well.
but there was no real development to that point. it was like a 180 all of a sudden that created conflict
shultz had issues with slavery and then after doing a good thing just goes, "frick it i'm going to die here making a moral point in front of people who won't give a shite, instead of leaving and coming back to kill them later." like i said, it was just forced
Posted on 12/26/12 at 6:41 pm to Rittdog
how can a movie with pitt have better acting than a movie with leonardo
i enjoy both tho. i agree the dvd release with be even better.
i enjoy both tho. i agree the dvd release with be even better.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News