Started By
Message

re: 87 lb cottonmouth?

Posted on 12/7/12 at 9:26 am to
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56485 posts
Posted on 12/7/12 at 9:26 am to
they had to use a loader to hoist.....definitely 87 lbs.

As a professed snake hater, I must ask. Is it okay to kill them when they can eat a toddler?

Needless to say, no deer has entered that county in a while, 87 lb snakes will now be added to the list that includes bears.
Posted by Nodust
Member since Aug 2010
22635 posts
Posted on 12/7/12 at 9:28 am to
quote:

87 lb snakes will now be added to the list that includes bears.
Posted by jorconalx
alexandria
Member since Aug 2011
8629 posts
Posted on 12/7/12 at 9:36 am to
i think they used the loader cuz no one wanted to touch it

quote:

It's one of the biggest moccasins I've ever seen.


yea heard that, where was this again, just want to make sure i avoid this area.
This post was edited on 12/7/12 at 9:38 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram