Started By
Message

re: Big Ten facilities..why aren't they better?

Posted on 12/4/12 at 3:01 pm to
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
9538 posts
Posted on 12/4/12 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

There are some pretty shitty facilities at SEC schools as well. It's all relative.


Yep, Mizzou's aren't all that impressive at the moment, though the school is starting phase one of a $300 million upgrade next year.
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 12/4/12 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Yep, Mizzou's aren't all that impressive at the moment, though the school is starting phase one of a $300 million upgrade next year.


It's your first year in the SEC, no one expected you to be top notch. You were fairly well-off as far as your peers in the Big 12. This is a whole new level of competition.
This post was edited on 12/4/12 at 3:11 pm
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23168 posts
Posted on 12/4/12 at 3:05 pm to
I am not an expert, and I know they're important to kids, but WTF. Facilities?? I mean if you have a weight room, film rooms, team rooms, and an ok practice facility you should be fine.

I don't think you need a smoothie bar like Oregon has

Yes I know it sells recruits, but I guess I don't think that should be a killing point for programs. It didn't hurt Miami in the 90s/early 00s and it hasn't hurt USC much when they had crappy ones til recently
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram