Started By
Message

re: Would The Walking Dead have been better on HBO?

Posted on 12/3/12 at 9:43 am to
Posted by Jwodie
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2009
7223 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Would The Walking Dead have been better on HBO?


The question is absolutely without question YES. Not only from a nudity standpoint, but for censorship purposes. Furthermore, the writing on HBO shows is vastly superior to anything you see on cable networks.
Posted by Gnar Cat21
Piña Coladaburg
Member since Sep 2009
16850 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 9:49 am to
Exactly. Everyone saying it would just be about nudity and cussing isn't looking at the whole story

Funding would be higher, which would have meant better actors (sorry some of these actors are really terrible) and overall would have just been better funded. Meaning better props, crew, would have had more time to film, and it would overall just be a cleaner, tighter show.

I love walking dead, I really do, but money almost always helps a show. You can just afford to do more.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29497 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Furthermore, the writing on HBO shows is vastly superior to anything you see on cable networks.

The writing for the Walking Dead is anything but poor. I'd put this season thus far up there with anything on any TV network right now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram