Started By
Message

re: What was the deal with the penalty on Loston's INT?

Posted on 11/18/12 at 10:11 am to
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70992 posts
Posted on 11/18/12 at 10:11 am to
quote:

and, therefore, the helmet to helmet contact was a dead ball foul.

But it wasn't. If the refs were competent, it would have never happened. It happened in the course of the play. You can't just change the definition of what happened.
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 11/18/12 at 10:15 am to
quote:

But it wasn't. If the refs were competent, it would have never happened. It happened in the course of the play. You can't just change the definition of what happened.


I get the point you're trying to make, but the correct call was made and enforced.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram