Started By
Message

re: The only thing that bugged me about Skyfall

Posted on 11/17/12 at 9:27 am to
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
13129 posts
Posted on 11/17/12 at 9:27 am to
The character assassinated people as a career choice. His job was to solve problems by killing problems. He was good at it. To be good at any job, you have to love doing it. According to the script, the character had an awakening moment where his employer made a decision to let him be killed. Bond had the same moment at the beginning of the film.

Both characters faced with the same experience made opposite choices with their careers at that decision point. The story culminated with both characters pursuing opposing goals pertaining to their boss that chose to let them be killed. One chose to keep protecting her. One chose to kill her.

It is true that unlike prior villains, this villain didn't give two shits about world domination. But so what? I don't need every Bond villain to want to take over the world.

What more than revenge did you want this villain to pursue? Should he have been more materialistic? A sum of cash? Stock options? A dazzling piece of jewelry?
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36748 posts
Posted on 11/17/12 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

Posted by Willie Stroker
exactly
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51632 posts
Posted on 11/18/12 at 12:03 pm to
so they took the beginning of the man with the golden gun and turned it around.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram